Drost v. State

Nicholas Lawrence DROST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 5, 2008.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2008-12-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2012

1 state decisions

Relies on Robinson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-12-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Nicholas L. Drost, Gainesville, Pro Se.

¶2Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mary G. Jolley, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4AFFIRMED. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (2006) (permitting youthful offender to be sentenced up to statutory maximum, after revocation of probation if violation is substantive); Robinson v. State,702 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (holding that when youthful offender had committed new criminal offense that was substantive violation of probation, he could be sentenced in excess of general six-year limit for youthful offenders).

¶5GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.