Thomas v. PERS’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 607 So. 2d 1119 - Smith v. Jackson Const. Co. · 774 So. 2d 421 - PERC v. Marquez · 797 So. 2d 888 - PUBLIC EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. Dishmon · 706 So. 2d 258 - Brinston v. PERS · 846 So. 2d 1014 - PERS v. Dearman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A court faced with the review of a decision of an administrative agency is very limited as to the scope and depth of its inquiry. Rule 5.03 of the Uniform Circuit and County Court Rules provides that the reviewing court will entertain an appeal only to determine if the order or judgment of the lower authority was: 1) supported by substantial evidence; 2) arbitrary or capricious; 3) beyond the power of the lower authority to make; or 4) violated some statutory or constitutional right of the complaining party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.