Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 995 SW2D 135 - State v. Michael Holmes

State v. Michael Holmes’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2001
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Bartkus v. People of State of Illinois · United States v. Wheeler · State v. Ashby · United States v. Eaglin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is noteworthy that nowhere within the statute is there an explicit requirement that custody be for a state offense. Nor is there any indication that a prisoner’s status should be relevant to the escape inquiry. In fact, the statute is phrased in generic terms which tend to negate that very suggestion. It encompasses a person convicted of “an offense,” not “a . state offense.” It requires custody to be pursuant to the order of “a court,” not “a state court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.