Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 995 S.W.2d 259 - Pena v. State

Pena v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2001
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Thomas · Ex Parte Dickey · Ex Parte Townsend · Bushnell v. State · Bailey v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... where an issue concerns technical, procedural requirements such as the issue before us ... practitioners rightfully look to the opinions of the appellate court in their jurisdiction for guidance on accepted practice. We hold that when an appellate court has a case presenting this kind of issue transferred to it, the court accepting the transfer should apply the law of the transferring jurisdiction so as to uphold the rightful expectations of practitioners in the transferring jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.