Gibson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
35 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. State · Coit v. State · Tigner v. State · Maibauer v. State · Guinn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“prior intoxication-related offenses, whether they are felonies or misdemeanors, serve the purpose of establishing whether the instant offense qualifies as felony driving while intoxicated. The prior intoxication-related offenses are elements of the offense of driving while intoxicated. They define the offense as a felony and are admitted into evidence as part of the State’s proof of its case-in-chief during the guilt-innocence stage of the trial.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bryant v. State · Martin v. State“Class A and B misdemeanor driving while intoxicated offenses are tried in the county courts .... Felony driving while intoxicated offenses are tried in either the district courts or the criminal district courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Oliva v. State“a felony offense other than a state jail felony”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Campbell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.