State v. King’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Corley v. United States · State v. Johnson · Billman v. Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund · State v. Nardolillo · State v. Ferola
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Any person making an arrest without a warrant shall take the arrested person without unnecessary delay before a judge of the District Court for the division in which the arrest was made or in which the crime was committed. * * * Whenever an arrest shall be made, the arrested person shall be afforded a prompt hearing for the purpose of admission to bail before a judge of the District Court or an officer authorized to bail persons * * *."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barros“the elapsed time between the defendant's arrest and his confession is the critical period [that] we must examine and scrutinize in order to determine if it had been operative in inducing the defendant's admissions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barros“consider whether the so-called delay in bringing the defendant before a judicial officer in any way prompted [the defendant] to give the police his inculpatory statement”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barros
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.