Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · United States v. Welty · Hooks v. State · Stigars v. State · Briscoe v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial judge should consider the defendant’s background, experience, and conduct, and advise the defendant [of the eight factors].”); Boyer v. State, 985 A.2d 389 , 2009 WL 3841973, at (Del. Nov. 16, 2009) (TABLE) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holland v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.