Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

996 A.2d 821

In re Christenson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 2010-06-03

Relies on In re Willingham

Decided 2010-06-03

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2On consideration of the certified order of the California Supreme Court disbarring *822respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see In re Christenson, No. 08-N-13625 (Cal. Oct. 14, 2009) (en banc), this court’s March 30, 2010, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

¶3ORDERED that G. Scott Christenson, Esquire, is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C. 2006). It is

¶4FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

/996/a2d/821 · .json · Public domain