Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

996 F.2d 1212

Docket No. 93-6103.

Redmond v. Prince

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 7, 1993. Decided: June 23, 1993.

This page is marked noindex.

Relies on United States of America v. Alvis III

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-06-23

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-92-2216-2-17AK)

David R. Redmond, Appellant Pro Se.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

David R. Redmond appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Redmond v. Prince, No. CA-92-2216-2-17AK (D.S.C. Jan. 12, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/996/f2d/1212 · .json · Public domain