Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 996 F.2d 1273 - Hurlburt v. Cunningham

Hurlburt v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis

996 F.2d 1273 · 1993

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
October 2001
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · United States v. Goodwin · Alabama v. Smith · Doerr v. Doerr · Johnson v. Righetti

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our research indicates that decisions by the circuit courts of appeals after McCullough have uniformly held that the Pearce presumption does not apply to the two-sentencer situation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.