Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

996 F.2d 270

Docket No. 89-5981.

Nelson v. Saudi Arabia

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1993.

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-07-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1993

1 federal appellate ·

5 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 46

Relies on Saudi Arabia v. Nelson · Nelson v. Arabia

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1993-07-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Jorge A. Duarte, P.A., Miami, FL, for plaintiffs-appellants.

¶2Anthony D’Amato, Northwestern University School of Law, Chicago, IL, for Nelson.

¶3Maureen E. Mahoney, Lathan & Watkins, Washington, DC, for Saudi Arabia.

¶4Marc Cooper, Cooper, Wolfe & Bolotin, P.A., Miami, FL, for King Faisal Hosp. and SA.

¶5Douglas Letter, Appellate Staff, Civ. Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, for U.S. amicus.

¶7ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

¶8Before EDMONDSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges.*

¶9PER CURIAM:

¶10In the light of Saudi Arabia, et al. v. Nelson, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1471, 123 L.Ed.2d 47 (1993), our prior opinion in this case, 923 F.2d 1528, is VACATED and the cause is REMANDED to the district court *271for dismissal in accordance with the Supreme Court’s judgment.

¶11VACATED AND REMANDED.

/996/f2d/270 · .json · Public domain