Bumgardner v. Lite Cellular, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1681N · 15 U.S.C. § 1681S · 15 U.S.C. § 1692K (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Farrar v. Hobby · Califano v. Yamasaki · Simmons v. Poe · Manning v. Hunt · Hetzel v. County of Prince William
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Compliance with the requirements imposed under [the FCRA] shall be enforced under the Federal Trade Commission Act . . . by the Federal Trade Commission.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bernita Washington“) violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bernita Washington
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.