996 F. Supp. 2d 815 - Smith v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (Indian Crimes Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 1161
Relies on DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial District · Seymour v. Superintendent of Washington State Penitentiary · Mattz v. Arnett · Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Kneip · Solem v. Bartlett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this case, I must decide whether Congress's Act of August 7, 1882 ... diminished the boundaries of the Omaha Indian Reservation, or whether the Act simply permitted non-Indians to settle within existing Omaha Reservation boundaries”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nebraska v. Parker“annually expended for the benefit of said Indians, under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nebraska v. Parker“lands are open for settlement under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nebraska v. Parker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.