Parker v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 177 N.J. Super. 471 - Kikkert v. Kikkert · Woodward v. Woodward · Hall v. Hall · Morgan v. Morgan · Olympus Hills Shopping Center, Ltd. v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[Wlhere one party has dissipated an asset, hidden its value or otherwise acted obstructively, the trial court may, in the exercise of its equitable powers, value a marital asset at some time other than the time the decree is entered, such as at separation," "or may otherwise hold one party accountable to the other for the dissipation of marital assets."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“to show that the funds were not dissipated, but were used for some legitimate marital purpose.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“to account for the missing money and demonstrate that it was spent to service or retire marital debt, to pay taxes for which both parties were responsible, to close the gap between income and reasonable living expenses, or for other marital purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.