Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 996 P.2d 788 - O.R.L. v. Smith

O.R.L. v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on People in Interest of CAK · Sweeney v. Summers · In Re Krystal S.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is granted broad discretion in all cases involving protected persons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re JCT
  2. “terminating the parent-child legal relationship.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re JCT

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.