Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 996 SO2D 148 - Glenn v. State

Glenn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 208 So. 2d 886 - Carr v. State · 574 So. 2d 685 - McQuarter v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The evidence was sufficient to establish Glenn’s guilt of each element of conspiracy. The evidence also was sufficient to enable a reasonable juror to find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Glenn-knowing of the plan to rob the bank-drove Green, Daniels, and Smith to the bank, waited for them outside, and then served as the getaway driver. Id. at 157 . In Glenn , serving as getaway driver was enough to uphold a guilty verdict Id. at 157 . There is substantially more evidence to support the jury’s verdict in this case. Taylor went into the Handy Mart with two other active participants in the robbery, helped robbed the store, and assumed the role of getaway driver. Taylor, Nussie, and Bubblehead then discussed “who had Taylor’s back” during the robbery and divided the money three ways.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.