Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

996 So. 2d 850

Wallace v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 2008-04-04

Decided 2008-04-04

BASCHAB, Presiding Judge,

¶1dissenting.

¶2Because the appellant’s argument regarding the improper use of his previous conviction for receiving stolen property may be meritorious, we should remand this case for the circuit court to take evidence and to make specific findings of fact as to this claim. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

/996/so2d/850 · .json · Public domain