Miller v. State

Christopher MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 16, 2008.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2008-12-16

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2017

5 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Christopher Miller seeks review of a trial court order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because Appellant's sentence for grand theft has expired, his case is hereby dismissed as moot.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 237 So. 3d 1058 - James v. State

Relies on 741 So. 2d 1157 - Pressley v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-12-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Christopher Miller, pro se, Appellant.

¶2Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Joshua R. Heller, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Christopher Miller seeks review of a trial court order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because Appellant's sentence for grand theft has expired, his case is hereby dismissed as moot. See Pressley v. State,741 So.2d 1157 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (stating that a claim raised pursuant to rule 3.800(a) may be moot once the movant has completed his sentence).

¶5DISMISSED.

¶6BARFIELD, ALLEN, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.