Matthews v. Pickett County’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
January 2007
most recently cited
6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ezell v. Cockrell · Doe a v. Coffee County Board of Education · Chase v. City of Memphis · Watts v. Robertson County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) officials, by their actions, affirmatively undertake to protect the plaintiff, and the plaintiff relies upon the undertaking; 2) a statute specifically provides for a cause of action against an official or municipality for injuries resulting to a particular class of individuals, of which the plaintiff is a member, from failure to enforce certain laws; or 3) the plaintiff alleges a cause of action involving intent, malice, or reckless misconduct.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The "District Court found that despite [the] abundance of probable cause to arrest Mr. Winningham for violating the' order of protection, the deputies failed to arrest [him] and “went home and went to bed.” We agree with the district court’s holding. Hs H« ^ ‡ H* H* The record supports a finding that the deputies’ failure to arrest Winningham was a deviation from a policy as expressed by statutory mandate and was operational in nature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“assaulted, beaten, and sexually violated”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.