State v. Lemacks’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
27 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Schad v. Arizona · State v. Cabbage · State v. Tuggle · Burlison v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the indictment was valid in describing the DUI offense, including the time, date, and location where the offense allegedly occurred. The theories available to support a conviction of that offense were not required to be included in the indictment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hammonds“[i]t is well established that any person who aids or abets in the commission of a criminal offense is guilty in the same degree as the principal who committed the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rice“than a general verdict in cases where only one offense is at issue based upon a single criminal occurrence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Butler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.