Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 996 SW2D 276 - Garza v. State

Garza v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 219th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. State · Bradley v. State · Leal v. State · Berg v. Dentists Insurance · Meador v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute in that it is either (1) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (2) capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Judicial notice is an exception to the normal requirement of proof, which must be justified by a `high degree of indisputability.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.