Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 996 SW2D 652 - Keck v. Keck

Keck v. Keck’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pirtle v. Cook · Marriage of Slay v. Slay · Javier v. Javier · Keck v. Keck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is improper to use a [ nunc pro tunc ] order ... to conform to what the court intended to do but did not do.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “establish[ ] a bright-line standard designed to notify all parties with certainty that the court has entered judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.