Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 997 A2D 673 - Forehand v. State

Forehand v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Flemming v. Nestor · Harrah Independent School District v. Martin · Williams v. State · DiStefano v. Watson · Crosby v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by prohibiting sentences that are `greatly disproportion[ate]' to the conduct being punished.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “lead[ ] to an inference of gross disproportionality.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.