Warner v. Zent’s Empirical Analysis
997 F.2d 116 · 1993
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2025
10 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Kotteakos v. United States · Coleman v. Thompson · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Estelle v. McGuire
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘The underlying principle is that no man shall be held criminally responsible for conduct which he could not reasonably understand to be proscribed.’ ” (emphasis added)) (quoting United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612 , 617, 74 S.Ct. 808 , 98 L.Ed. 989 (1954)); id. at 127 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Such headings, however, do not constitute any part of Ohio law. Resort to a title in construing a statute is unnecessary and improper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.