Osborn v. Shillinger’s Empirical Analysis
997 F.2d 1324 · 1993
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2012 · most notably John Joseph Romano v. Gary Gibson Warden of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary (2001), Steele v. Young (1993)
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Boykin v. Alabama · Haines v. Kerner · North Carolina v. Pearce · North Carolina v. Alford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Though [petitioner] does not directly state a claim for ineffective counsel ..., we must construe his claims liberally because he appears pro se. On that basis, we will address his contentions of counsel failure as ineffective assistance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is beyond dispute that a guilty plea must be both knowing and voluntary. The standard was and remains whether the plea represents a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action open to the defendant.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“so prejudicial as to deny him a fair trial, he should have challenged [it] directly in the trial court, on appeal, or in a collateral attack rather than pleading guilty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.