Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 997 F.2d 378 - United States v. Wiley

United States v. Wiley’s Empirical Analysis

997 F.2d 378 · 1993

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2013 · most notably United States v. Pielago (1998), United States v. McCurdy (1994)

41 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

470199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3162 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Kastigar v. United States · Oregon v. Elstad · Jencks v. United States · Rita v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]ur standard for reviewing the jury's finding of forfeiture is whether, in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any reasonable jury could have found the property forfeitable beyond a reasonable doubt,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “rejected a fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree argument and held that a second confession, given after a proper Miranda warning, was admissible, although it came on the heels of an unwarned statement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Fifth Amendment... prohibits only the use of compelled testimony”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.