United States v. Grady’s Empirical Analysis
997 F.2d 421 · 1993
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2010
17 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Olano · Estelle v. Williams · Oklahoma v. New Mexico · In re Disbarment of Sabiston · Licht v. Texas Commerce Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“justifiable dissatisfaction with appointed counsel,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“does not reflect an irreconcilable conflict or complete breakdown in communication between them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.