United States v. Ono’s Empirical Analysis
997 F.2d 647 · 1993
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 2001
most recently cited
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United States · United States v. Lira-Barraza · United States v. Schaff · United States v. Ono
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he district court may not depart from the applicable Guideline range unless it identifies an aggravating circumstance of a kind or to a degree the Commission did not adequately take into account when formulating the Guidelines.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) the timeliness of the motion; (2) the adequacy of the court's inquiry into the defendant's reasons; and (3) whether there was a lack of communication between defendant and his counsel that impeded the presentation of an adequate defense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.