Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 997 F.2d 784 - Franz v. Lytle

Franz v. Lytle’s Empirical Analysis

997 F.2d 784 · 1993

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Tenenbaum v. Williams (1999), Brokaw v. Mercer County (2000)

19 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

210199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Terry v. Ohio · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Katz v. United States · Anderson v. Creighton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e must be sensitive to the fact that society's interest in the protection of children is, indeed, multifaceted, composed not only with concerns about the safety and welfare of children from the community's point of view, but also with the child's psychological well-being, autonomy, and relationship to the family or caretaker setting.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “reasonably necessary to alleviate the threat”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]e must further underscore the defendant's motive to protect the child ... does not vitiate plaintiffs' Fourth Amendment rights. That motive, however, may enter the calculus of the damages, if any, that his actions justify. We must leave that determination for a jury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.