United States v. Naugle’s Empirical Analysis
997 F.2d 819 · 1993
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2024 · most notably United States v. Lang (1996), United States v. Janus Industries (1995)
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · United States v. Ross · Texas v. Brown · Sedillo v. United States · Horton v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'in arriving at the place from which the evidence could be plainly viewed.' " Id. (quoting Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 , 136, 110 S.Ct. 2301, 2308, 110 L.Ed.2d 112 (1990)). Second, "the item must not only be in plain sight, but its incriminating character must also be immediately apparent.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'lawful search of fixed premises generally extends to the entire area in which the object of the search may be found and is not limited by the possibility that separate acts of entry or opening may be required to complete the search.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“make the severability doctrine applicable the valid portions of the warrant must be sufficiently particularized, distinguishable from the invalid portions, and make up the greater part of the warrant.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.