Murphey v. Lanier’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1581 · 33 U.S.C. § 921 · 47 U.S.C. § 227 · 47 U.S.C. § 407 · 47 U.S.C. § 535 · 47 U.S.C. § 605
Relies on Cannon v. University of Chicago · Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington · Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr · Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley · Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t shall be unlawful for any person within the United States . . . to use any telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other device to send an unsolicited advertisement to a telephone facsimile machine.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the statute that creates the cause of action,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.