United States v. Mango’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 3012 · 10 U.S.C. § 3013 · 16 U.S.C. § 1611 · 16 U.S.C. § 460I · 16 U.S.C. § 661 (Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 245 · 18 U.S.C. § 2516 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3572
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Giordano · Watt v. Alaska
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“backfilling of trenches excavated in waterways and wetland areas”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“remove in their entirety, any cofferdams, dewatering devices, log roads or other temporary structures or fills placed within the waters of the United States to facilitate pipeline installation, immediately upon cessation of the construction activity in that particular area.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“unambiguously demonstrates that Congress intended to limit the Secretary's delegation authority to the Chief of Engineers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.