Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 997 F. Supp. 322 - Codapro Corp. v. Wilson

997 F. Supp. 322 - Codapro Corp. v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
January 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2017

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

140199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447

Relies on Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets · Rufo v. Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail · Quality Inns International, Inc. v. L.B.H. Associates Ltd. Partnership · Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corp. · Getty Oil Corporation, Succeeded by and a Division of Texaco, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North America

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Judging by the similarity of these letters, which contain identical contents, typeface and overall appearance, all were prepared by the same individual— perhaps by Boyd. Also, Boyd supplies a letter that he wrote to "Ken Nunley, Esq.," which states, "Thank you for your kind assistance in connection with our removal ... I have confirmed with you that Ed Canino [another individual co-defendant] approves the removal".”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Accordingly, `there must be some timely filed written indication from each defendant, or some person or entity purporting to formally act on its behalf in this respect and to have authority to do so, that it has actually consented to such action.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he burden is on the removing party to prove that it has met the requirements for removal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.