Sherman v. Yahoo! Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 47 U.S.C. § 227 · 47 U.S.C. § 230 (Communications Decency Act § 230)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · School District No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the equipment used by the Defendant has the capacity to store or produce cellular telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator, or from a list of telephone numbers”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.