King v. Sebelius’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 36B · 26 U.S.C. § 5000A · 26 U.S.C. § 7422 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1397E (§ 2006 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 18021 · 42 U.S.C. § 18022
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Conley v. Gibson · Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Hishon v. King & Spalding
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an Exchange established by the State under section 1311 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act [hereinafter 42 U.S.C. § 18031 ].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an Exchange serving the individual market ... regardless of whether the Exchange is established and operated by a State ... or by HHS,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[e]ach State shall ... establish an American Health Benefit Exchange ... for the State.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.