Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 997 P2D 436 - State v. Letourneau

State v. Letourneau’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2021

19 state decisions

140200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Meyer v. State of Nebraska · Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · 118 Wash. 2d 801 - Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosley · 121 Wash. 2d 22 - State v. Riley · 106 Wash. 2d 212 - Bering v. Share

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “more appropriate forums than the criminal sentencing process to address the best interests of dependent children with respect to most visitation issues.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`Crime-related prohibition' means an order of a court prohibiting conduct that directly relates to the circumstances of the crime for which the offender has been convicted, and shall not be construed to mean orders directing an offender affirmatively to participate in rehabilitative programs or to otherwise perform affirmative conduct.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Although the conduct prohibited during community custody must be directly related to the crime, it need not be causally related to the crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.