Boise Cascade Corp. v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"`[I]f the effects of the loss of the member extend to other parts of the body and interfere with their efficiency, the schedule allowance for the lost member is not exclusive.'"”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Vintage Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Hayes · 997 So. 2d 1042 - Boise Cascade Corp. v. Jackson

2. ““This case does not present a situation in which the pain, although isolated to the scheduled member, causes a disability to the body as a whole. We recognize that pain can be totally, or virtually totally, debilitating, but this case does not present such a situation; therefore, we decline to address that situation here.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 31 So. 3d 150 - WEHADKEE YARN MILLS v. Harris

3. “). On certiorari review, our supreme court reversed that decision, essentially holding that there is no "requirement for a permanent physical injury to other parts of the body in order to take the injury out of the schedule. . . .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 997 So. 2d 1042 - Boise Cascade Corp. v. Jackson