Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

997 So. 2d 1119

Docket No. 3D07-2159.

Ramos v. Lopez

David RAMOS, Appellant, v. Begoña LOPEZ, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 1, 2008.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied December 31, 2008.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2008-10-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2012

1 state decisions

Relies on 597 So. 2d 359 - Bible v. Bible · Gaudette v. Gaudette · Friedman v. University of Miami

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-10-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*1120 Barranco & Kircher and Raymond J. Rafool and Melissa Acosta Rodriguez, for appellant.

¶2Laura Fabar, Coral Gables; Jay M. Levy, Miami, for appellee.

¶3Before GREEN, SHEPHERD, and LAGOA, JJ.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The former husband, David Ramos, appeals from an order awarding the former wife, Begona Lopez, her attorney's fees, costs and suit money in this dissolution of marriage action. Because the final judgment placed the parties in financially equipoised positions, we reverse. See Gaudette v. Gaudette,890 So.2d 1161 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (ex-husband should not have been ordered to pay ex-wife's attorney's fees where the parties were left in relatively equal financial positions); Bible v. Bible,597 So.2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (trial court did not abuse its discretion when it ordered each party to pay their own fees after a near equal distribution of property).

¶6If, on remand, the trial court specifically finds that the former husband has engaged in vexatious, excessive, or unnecessary litigation, the court would be authorized to assess attorney's fees and costs against the former husband for such actions. See Romero v. Romero,971 So.2d 863, 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (where former husband engaged in vexatious litigation attorney's fees award justified).

¶7Reversed and remanded.

/997/so2d/1119 · .json · Public domain