Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 997 So. 2d 149 - Davis v. Davis

997 So. 2d 149 - Davis v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 348 So. 2d 75 - Pearce v. Pearce · 966 So. 2d 1040 - Copeland v. Copeland · 773 So. 2d 185 - Curtis v. Curtis · Carmena v. East Baton Rouge Sheriff's Department · 975 So. 2d 81 - Straughter v. Hodnett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Considering the strong constitutional bias in favor of open access by the public to court proceedings, we find the trial court’s blanket order sealing the entire record in this case to be overbroad. Although there may be some justification for sealing certain sensitive evidence in a proceeding, the parties have the burden of making a specific showing that their privacy interests outweigh the public’s constitutional right of access to the record. The trial court, should it grant such relief, must ensure that its order is narrowly tailored to cause the least interference possible with the right of public access.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “|7A. When there is a child support award in a specific amount per child, the award for each child shall terminate automatically without any action by the obligor upon each child’s attaining the age of majority, or upon emancipation relieving the child of the disabilities attached to minority. B. When there is a child support award in globo for two or more children, the award shall terminate automatically and without action by the obligor when the youngest child for whose benefit the award was made attains the age of majority or is emancipated relieving the child of the disabilities attached to minority.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.