Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 997 SO2D 262 - Starr v. State

Starr v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Olano · Harris v. New York · City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc. · North Carolina v. Butler · United States v. Montos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party who fails to make a contemporaneous objection at trial must' rely on plain error to raise the- issue on appeal, because it is otherwise- procedurally barred. The plain-error doctrine requires a party to prove that an error occurred which resulted in a manifest miscarriage of justice. This doctrine is only available when a defendant’s substantive" or fundamental rights have been violated.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “an error that resulted in a manifest miscarriage of justice or [one that] seriously affects the fairness, integrity[,] or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “whether the trial court deviated from a known legal rule ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.