MIRAN v. State

Seyed R. MIRAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 7, 2009.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-01-07

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2011

2 state decisions

Relies on Adams v. State · McCarrick v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-01-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Bruce P. Taylor, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

¶2Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

¶3KHOUZAM, Judge.

¶4Seyed R. Miran appeals an order revoking his probation. The trial court found that Miran violated conditions one and three of his supervision order by leaving the jurisdiction without permission and by failing to report. Because these violations were established solely on the basis of hearsay evidence, we reverse. See McCarrick v. State,553 So.2d 1373 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Adams v. State,521 So.2d 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

¶5Reversed.

¶6NORTHCUTT, C.J., and STRINGER, J., Concur.