Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 997 SW2D 399 - Carroll v. State

Carroll v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2003
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Green v. State · Cordova v. State · Faulder v. State · Johnson v. State · Cumbo v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e cannot determine any meaningful difference between the two venirepersons. The judge was absolutely correct in allowing the challenge to the first and should have been consistent and allowed the second challenge.” Carroll v. State, 997 S.W.2d 399, 404 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1999) (Carroll I). Chief Justice Walker dissented and argued that this”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.