Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

998 F.2d 1009

Docket No. 92-2566.

Hale v. Centennial Development Co.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: June 10, 1993. July 6, 1993.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-06-10

Relies on Frank Lathen Hinton v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-06-10

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (88-2084-BLA)

Mable Ann Hale, Petitioner Pro Se. Elsey Allen Harris, III, Mullins, Thomason & Harris, Norton, Virginia; Marta Kusic, Staff Attorney, Tanya P. Harvey, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Mable Ann Hale seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (West 1988 & Supp. 1992). Our review of the record and the Board's decision and order discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Hale v. Centennial Develop., Inc., BRB No. 88-2084-BLA (Ben. Rev. Bd. Oct. 29, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/998/f2d/1009 · .json · Public domain