Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,652’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 9 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably Kaplan v. Rose (1994), Malone v. Microdyne Corp. (1994)
15 federal appellate · 9 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Basic Inc. v. Levinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“negotiations with an insurance company that would act as a guarantor” on the company’s loans and a repurchase by the company of some 400,000 shares of its own stock”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) the defendant made a false statement or omission of material fact (2) with scienter (3) upon which the plaintiff justifiably relied 1 (4) that proximately caused the plaintiff's damages.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) Offers or sells a security in violation of subsection (2) of § 35-1-170 or § 35-1-140 or § 35-1-810, or of any rule or order under § 35-1-50 which required the affirmative approval of sales literature before it is used or of any condition imposed under § 35-1-950 or § 35-1-990; or (2) Offers or sells a security by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading, the buyer not knowing of the untruth or omission____”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.