United States v. Dandy’s Empirical Analysis
998 F.2d 1344 · 1993
Citation profile
79 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 151 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2024 · most notably United States v. Carroll (1994), United States v. Frost (1997)
79 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1505 · 18 U.S.C. § 152 · 26 U.S.C. § 6531 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 28 U.S.C. § 1341 · 28 U.S.C. § 455
Relies on Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor · McNally v. United States · Michelson v. United States · Kuntz v. City of Dayton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 151 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although specificity of grounds is not required in a Rule 29 motion, where a Rule 29 motion is made on specific grounds, all grounds not specified are waived.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]lthough specificity of grounds is not required in a [Crim.R. 29] motion, * * * all grounds not specified are waived”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. ■”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.