Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 998 F.2d 1460 - United States of America v. Anthony Lapierre

United States of America v. Anthony Lapierre’s Empirical Analysis

998 F.2d 1460 · 1993

Citation profile

89
cited by 89 later decisions
14
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

44 federal appellate · 3 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably United States v. Davis (1994), United States v. Vance (1995)

44 federal appellate · 3 district · 22 state decisions — followed in 14 states

4401993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Wade · Rhode Island v. Innis · Gilbert v. California · Kirby v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “risk of invading the province of the jury and unfairly prejudicing”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the exercise of rights may diminish the defendant's chances of being granted the two level reduction, not because it is weighed against him but because it is likely that there is less evidence of acceptance to weigh in his favor”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “3E1.1 does not allow the judge to weigh against the defendant's exercise of constitutional or statutory rights.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.