Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 998 F.2d 342 - Bogle v. Sullivan

Bogle v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

998 F.2d 342 · 1993

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
November 2017
most recently cited

34 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably Walters v. Commissioner of Social Security (1997), Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security (2003)

34 federal appellate ·

480199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Califano v. Sanders · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Kirk v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Duncan v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This court must affirm the Commissioner’s conclusions absent a determination that the Commissioner has failed to apply the correct legal standards or has made findings of fact unsupported by substantial evidence in the record. Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. Accordingly, this court may not try the case de novo, nor resolve conflicts in evidence, nor decide questions of credibility.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “great weight only if they are supported by sufficient clinical findings and are consistent with the evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “determination must stand regardless of whether the reviewing court would resolve the issues of fact in dispute differently.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.