American Academy of Ophthalmology, Inc. v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis
998 F.2d 377 · 1993
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2013 · most notably United States v. Rutgard (1997), Kelley v. Ei De Nemours and Company (1994)
12 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1128b of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395 (§ 1801 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395A (§ 1802 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395B · 42 U.S.C. § 1395J (§ 1831 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395U (§ 1842 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395W (§ 1848 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty · Mart Corporation v. Cartier Inc 47th Street Photo Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The moving party has the burden of conclusively showing that no genuine issue of material fact exists.... Nevertheless, in the face of a summary judgment motion, the nonmoving party cannot rest on its pleadings but must come forward with some probative evidence to support its claim____ “By its very terms, this standard provides that the mere existence of some alleged factual dispute between the parties will not defeat an otherwise properly supported motion for summary judgment; the requirement is that there be no genuine issue of material fact.” ... The dispute must be genuine and the facts must be such that if they were proven at trial, a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party____ If the disputed evidence “is merely colorable or is not significantly probative, summary judgment may be granted.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in which case the physician may accept or decline the assignment of Medicare benefits on a case-by-case basis. Id. at 379. 1 13 C. Preclusion of judicial review of conversion factor 14 With the adoption of the new Part B payment scheme, Congress enacted a provision barring administrative and judicial review of the Secretary's determinations in establishing the fee schedule. 42 U.S.C. § 1395w-4(i)(1). Specifically, this”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Painter v. Shalala“in which case the physician agrees to accept assignment of Medicare benefits for all Part B services that the physician provides. 42 U.S.C. § 1395u(h). Alternatively, a physician may decline to become a”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Painter v. Shalala
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.