Richardson v. Gramley’s Empirical Analysis
998 F.2d 463 · 1993
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2012
12 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Illinois v. Gates · Batson v. Kentucky · Teague v. Lane · Griffith v. Kentucky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A judgment is not final if the appellate court has remanded the case to the lower court for further proceedings, unless the remand is for a purely `ministerial' purpose, involving no discretion, such as recomputing prejudgment interest according to a set formula.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a case in which a judgment of conviction has been rendered, the availability of appeal exhausted, and the time for a petition for certiorari elapsed or a petition for certiorari finally denied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. People v. Sharp“[W]ith respect to finality: The designation given the judgment by state practice is not controlling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Graham v. Borgen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.