Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 998 F.2d 542 - United States v. Fort

United States v. Fort’s Empirical Analysis

998 F.2d 542 · 1993

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
November 2015
most recently cited

28 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably United States v. James (1994), United States v. Dortch (1993)

28 federal appellate ·

190199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Wright v. Wright · Reiter v. Cooper · United States v. Townsend · United States v. Durrive · United States v. Douglas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a buyer-seller instruction would have been inconsistent with the defense position that Mr. Fort was not a buyer at all.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the government must show both that he knew of the conspiracy and that he intended to join its criminal purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.